Analysis of Canada’s 2017 HIV Surveillance Report

In December of 2018, researchers from the Public Health Agency of Canada released the 2017 HIV Surveillance Report. In the Canadian Communicable Disease Report (CCDR) article, the researchers downplay the impact of rising HIV rates, and indeed even downplay the existence of such an increase. Canada’s HIV response needs to be strengthened to address these realities, and not be allowed to languish in an atmosphere of complacency. The fight against HIV is not over, and we cannot be complacent when an average of 6.6 new HIV diagnoses are given daily.

Number of new infections

In perhaps the most incongruous interpretation of the data, the researchers state that a 3% increase in the number of new HIV infections from 2016 to 2017 is “slight”. However, by looking closer at their data, we can see that from 2014 to 2017 there has been a 17.1% increase in new HIV infections in Canada, signifying that there has been a major upward trend new cases that continued in 2017.

We can note the following from the data given on number of cases and rate of infection:

  • The number of new infections in 2016 was the largest year-over-year increase since 1997.
  • The number of new infections had been going down since 2009, but have been going back up for the last four years.
  • The rate of infections per 100,000 people had been staying the same or going down for 7 years, but saw a sharp increase of 10.3% in 2016, which, like the number of cases, is the largest increase in the data. This increase continued in 2017, when there was a 1.6% increase in the number of new infections per 100,000.

Geographic Distribution

In general, the interpretation in the CCDR article is straightforward. We can note the following from the data given in the article:

  • The two provinces with the largest proportion of new infections are Ontario (935 new infections, 38.9% of the overall total) and Quebec (670 new infections, 27.9% of the overall total).
  • The two provinces with the highest rate of infection are Saskatchewan (15.5 new infections per 100,000 people) and Quebec (8.0 new infections per 100,000 people).
  • The difference between the largest share of infections and the highest rate of infection demonstrates that not only is reducing the number of infections important, but also taking into account the impact that HIV can have on a community when rates of infection are high.

Age distribution

In the supplementary tables, the information on age is broken down by both gender and geographical location. We can note the following from the data:

  • Children aged under 15 years, adults aged 30-39, and adults aged 40-49 saw an increase in the number of new infections from 2016 to 2017, while youth aged 15-19, adults aged 20-29, and adults aged 50+ saw a decrease in the number of new infections.
  • Youth aged 15-29 accounted for:
    • 23% (545) of cases in 2017
    • 25% (574) of cases in 2016
    • 27% (558) of cases in 2015
    • 23% (475) of cases in 2014
    • 24% (504) of cases in 2013
    • 25% (514) of cases in 2012
  • Between 2016 and 2017 youth aged 15-19 had a 17% increase while youth aged 20-29 had a 4% decrease.
    • This is why it is important to address both groups, as the same number of infections can have a very different impact on the total.
  • Adults aged 30-39 had the largest increase in the total number of cases (73 new infections).
  • Among people over 50, both the number of cases and the proportion of the total new infections they represent has been on the rise since 2012, with a slight decrease in 2017. We must continue to follow this number to analyze the specific needs of an HIV diagnosis in older adults.

Sex/Gender Distribution

Note: The gender binary was assumed in much of the data given. In some charts there was a third option, but it lumped together sex not reported, transsexual and transgender.

  • Since 2012, the proportion of people newly diagnosed with HIV who identify as female has remained steady at around 22-25%.

Exposure category distribution

Although there has been an increase in the number and proportion of new HIV infections attributable to people who use injection drugs, this category is not the only one increasing, and is not the largest or most steady increase of the last five years. Other exposure categories have also been increasing, including heterosexual sex among people not from a country where HIV is endemic, which has been increasing in both number of new infections and the proportion of the total. If we focus only on harms from the opioid epidemic, then we risk leaving people behind who may mistakenly assume they are not at risk. There has been a slight increase in the number of infections among immigrants from a country where HIV is endemic, but this can be attributed to higher rates in general.

Selected Raw Data

Number of reported HIV Cases, 1996-2016

Data on the number of cases and rate per 100,000 people is taken from Haddad et al 2018, Figure 1; rates of change are calculated based on that information.

Year # of cases % change from previous year rate per 100,000 % change from previous year
1996 2712 9.2
1997 2441 -10.0% 8.2 -10.9%
1998 2262 -7.3% 7.5 -8.5%
1999 2176 -3.8% 7.2 -4.0%
2000 2062 -5.2% 6.7 -6.9%
2001 2195 6.5% 7.1 6.0%
2002 2435 10.9% 7.8 9.9%
2003 2442 0.3% 7.7 -1.3%
2004 2489 1.9% 7.8 1.3%
2005 2451 -1.5% 7.6 -2.6%
2006 2497 1.9% 7.7 1.3%
2007 2402 -3.8% 7.3 -5.2%
2008 2599 8.2% 7.8 6.8%
2009 2365 -9.0% 7.0 -10.3%
2010 2300 -2.7% 6.8 -2.9%
2011 2273 -1.2% 6.6 -2.9%
2012 2073 -8.8% 6.0 -9.1%
2013 2059 -0.7% 5.9 -1.7%
2014 2051 -0.4% 5.8 -1.7%
2015 2096 2.2% 5.8 0.0%
2016 2331 11.2% 6.4 10.3%
2017 2402 3.0% 6.5 1.6%

 Sex/Gender data given

Number of cases data taken from Supplementary Table 5, percentages calculated.

Males Females Sex not reported/ transsexual/transgender Total
Cases % Cases % Cases % Cases
2007 1,776 74.5% 589 24.8% 7 0.0% 2,372
2008 1,903 74.2% 658 25.7% 4 0.0% 2,565
2009 1,740 74.4% 593 25.4% 6 0.0% 2,339
2010 1,746 76.8% 516 22.7% 11 0.0% 2,273
2011 1,713 76.1% 527 23.4% 11 0.0% 2,251
2012 1,574 76.6% 476 23.2% 5 0.0% 2,055
2013 1,591 78.2% 435 21.4% 9 0.0% 2,035
2014 1,542 75.6% 490 24.0% 7 0.0% 2,039
2015 1,583 76.0% 495 23.8% 5 0.0% 2,083
2016 1,771 76.5% 536 23.2% 8 0.0% 2,315
2017 1,777 75.1% 584 24.7% 5 0.0% 2,366

 

Scroll to Top